KLI Colloquia are invited research talks of about an hour followed by 30 min discussion. The talks are held in English, open to the public, and offered in hybrid format.
Join via Zoom:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/5881861923?omn=85945744831
Meeting ID: 588 186 1923
Spring-Summer 2026 KLI Colloquium Series
12 March 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
What Is Biological Modality, and What Has It Got to Do With Psychology?
Carrie Figdor (University of Iowa)
26 March 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
The Science of an Evolutionary Transition in Humans
Tim Waring (University of Maine)
9 April 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Hierarchies and Power in Primatology and Their Populist Appropriation
Rebekka Hufendiek (Ulm University)
16 April 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
A Metaphysics for Dialectical Biology
Denis Walsh (University of Toronto)
30 April 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
What's in a Trait? Reconceptualizing Neurodevelopmental Timing by Seizing Insights From Philosophy
Isabella Sarto-Jackson (KLI)
7 May 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
The Evolutionary Trajectory of Human Hippocampal-Cortical Interactions
Daniel Reznik (Max Planck Society)
21 May 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Why Directionality Emerged in Multicellular Differentiation
Somya Mani (KLI)
28 May 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
The Interplay of Tissue Mechanics and Gene Regulatory Networks in the Evolution of Morphogenesis
James DiFrisco (Francis Crick Institute)
11 June 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Brave Genomes: Genome Plasticity in the Face of Environmental Challenge
Silvia Bulgheresi (University of Vienna)
25 June 2026 (Thurs) 3-4:30 PM CET
Anne LeMaitre (KLI)
KLI Colloquia 2014 – 2026
Event Details
Topic description:
A central internalism/externalism debate in evolutionary theory concerns the relative importance of natural selection versus developmental constraints. The debate merely assumes, however, that natural selection only provides externalist explanations. I propose an interactionist notion of natural selection based on the complex situations that arise from ecologically-induced development and niche construction. One reason natural selection explanations are seen as externalist is due to the assumption that a common environment is prerequisite for fitness differences to reflect differences in the dispositions of organisms to survive and reproduce. The common environment then explains the direction of evolution by natural selection. I reject the presupposition of a common environment by arguing that organism-relevant environmental differences contribute to natural selection. The current arguments for a common environment commit “averaging fallacies” (Winther, Wade, Dimond 2013). Support for an interactionist account comes from alternative characterizations of niche construction. Niche Construction Theory maintains that natural selection explanations are externalist— natural selection is a process with a causal arrow that points outside-in. Niche construction is a complementary process that instead points inside-out to contribute to the environment that selects organisms. I argue that another type of niche construction — intra-population variation in niche constructing traits— supports an interactionist notion natural selection. Richard Lewontin’s Dialectical Biology and Denis Walsh’s elaboration of Lewontin’s account with JJ Gibson’s theory of ecological affordance lends further support to an interactionist view. An interactionist theory of natural selection breaks the internalist vs. externalist dichotomy on evolutionary explanations.
Biographical note:
Lynn Chiu is currently completing her Ph.D. at University of Missouri in Philosophy of Biology. She has a M.S. in Psychology and a B.S. in Life Sciences. She was a Writing-Up Fellow at the KLI in late 2013, and is currently a Visitor of the KLI Institute as well as a visiting Ph.D. student at University of Vienna.

